Author: Diane Jakacki

Early digital modern humanist. #a11y #reluctantpugilist

Categories
Digging Digital Edition

The Linn Diary: Feb 3-Apr 18, 1862

These are the collected transcribed pages of James Merrill Linn’s diary dated February 3 through April 18, 1862. The work was produced by students in HUMN 100, Section 02 – Fall 2014.

Collaborative Edition of February 3-12, 1862 (Bui, Harmatz, Hartman, Landow, Loomis, Medure, and O’Hara): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/Linn_FebCompiled.xml

Collaborative Edition of April 17-18, 1862: (Rosecky, Wigginton, and Zaki)
http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/Linn_AprilCompiled.xml

Hien Bui (Feb 3-5, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary33.xml

Rachel Harmatz (Feb 5-7, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary34.xml

Dale Hartman (Feb 7-8, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary35.xml

Alexa Landow (Feb 8, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary36.xml

Sam Loomis (Feb 8, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary37.xml

Mary Medure (Feb 8-9, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary38.xml

Connor O’Hara (Feb 9-12, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary39.xml

Sara Rosecky (Apr 17-18, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary60.xml

Julia Wigginton (Apr 18, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary61.xml

Riz Zaki (Apr 18, 1862): http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/LinnDiary62.xml

Compiled Edition of February 12-April 17, 1862 (Jakacki – formatting only):
http://www.students.bucknell.edu/projects/HUMN10002/Linn/content/Linn_Feb-AprCompiled.xml

Categories
Blog #4

Blog Prompt #4: On Close Reading (TEI)

Close reading allows us to consider at a micro level how an author expresses her/himself using specific terms, descriptions of people and places, and observations about his/her experiences. Over the last two weeks you have worked intensively, learning TEI-compliant XML markup and applying it to your transcriptions.

How has the process of marking up your transcription affected your understanding of the text
How has the process of collaborating as an editorial board with your peers changed your understanding of how edited texts are produced. For example, how did you resolve disputes over event vs. time or place vs. object?

Write at least 400 words on this topic. In your response to these questions please include at least three points made by Elena Pierazzo in her article, “A Rationale of Digital Documentary Editions” – in particular, how she considers the richness of the marked up text as a form of intellectual engagement with its interpretation.
As well, include at least two illustrative screenshots from your marked up text in the editing environment that illustrate your argument. Give your post the category “Blog #4″ and at least five tags that help you to explain your work.

In addition, choose one of your classmates’ posts and give them feedback in the Comment box. Your comment should be 75 words in length and respond to a specific argument that is made in the post. For example, your comment might identify a correlation between your own post and one you see in your classmate’s work.

Categories
Blog #3 Digging

Blog Post #3 Prompt

“On Time”
Due Sunday 10/5 by 11pm
Thinking about how we represent history has been a question that has occupied us for millennia.  Why does chronology of events matter?  What can it show?  How can we represent history? How do we “draw time”?

In “Time and Print,” Grafton observes that “Teachers and theorists claimed, over and over again, that chronology and geography were the two eyes of history: sources of precise, unquestionable information, which introduced order to the apparent chaos of events” (Grafton, p. 17)  At the same time, the author points to Joseph Priestley, the 19th century scientist who believed that “historical narrative is not linear.” (20) So how do we reconcile linear and nonlinear time?

In the process of compiling your entries for the collective 1860s Timemapper and thinking about how time played out for Linn in his diary, how have you come to terms with the complex relationship between ideas and modes of representation?  How does graphical representation clarifiy historical events?  Where do we place Linn’s narrative within that representation? Where do the 1860s and Linn’s experience in winter 1862 fit together?

Write a 300-word blog post on this topic.  Include at least three points from Grafton’s essay in your entry and at least two illustrative screen shots from Timemapper that illustrate your argument. Give your post the category “Blog #3” and at least five tags that help you to explain your work.

In addition, choose one of your classmates’ posts and give them feedback in the Comment box. Your comment should be 50-75 words in length and respond to a specific argument that is made in the post. For example, your comment might identify a correlation between your own post and one you see in your classmate’s work; it might introduce to the post’s author a different reading of something they interpreted in the Grafton essay; or it might reflect upon ways in which you both consider Linn’s experience within a larger chronological landscape.

Categories
Digging

Week Five Assignments, Readings, Exercises

Monday 9/29

  • Lab: Timemapper

Wednesday 10/1

  • Discussion: What does time visualization tell us about Linn?

Friday 10/3

  • Close reading module introduced
  • Transcription revised and re-compiled (using marked draft transcriptions)

Sunday 10/5

  • Blog post #3 “On Time” due (11pm)

Categories
Digging

Thinking about Time and Place

One of the things I love about doing historical research is learning about the time in which an event or series of events took place. In my opinion, you cannot consider people or the experiences (or their works) in a vacuum. To me, you can’t study Shakespeare without considering what was going on in England and the world during the reign of Elizabeth I.

The same holds true for how I think we should examine James Merrill Linn’s experience in the Civil War. While he might not always talk about what is going on in the wider world, we know that he was reading newspapers, and that waiting for news from the world beyond the battlefield was what kept him and his fellow soldiers going in what can only be imagined as horrific conditions.

We’re going to spend the next week thinking about the idea of time, and how the events in Linn’s life and in the Civil War more generally played out in the context of the decade of the 1860’s in terms of society, politics, science, technology, literature, and the arts on a global scale.

To do that we’re going to collaborate on the creation of a timeline using a multimedia timeline web-based platform called TimeMapper.

I’ve started a TimeMapper instance for our class, called “1860s Events”. It looks like this:TimeMapper

Your task will be to add event “slides” to this timeline. You will use Wikipedia’s list of events for the decade of the 1860s, add text and images that describe and evoke your event, and geospatial coordinates that will identify that event with a place.[1. A helpful way to find the longitude and latitude for a city, state, province, or country is to call up that place on Wikipedia; in the right sidebar you should see a link for “Coordinates.” Click on those numbers and you will be taken to a “GeoHack” page that provides the correct longitude and latitude.] The one caveat is that you need to find events that are not about the Civil War (or at least explicitly about the Civil War.) See what else was going on in the world in the 1860s!

In order for you to begin adding information to our TimeMapper, you will input data and metadata into a special Google Form that I have set up for this purpose: HUMN 100 TimeMapper Google Form.

Added by editor: please add your event and name to the table on this Google doc: https://docs.google.com/a/bucknell.edu/document/d/1t7Ff085N3rV02NLHEXRdxjjmLK51uqqMRgUJKRbtAPI/edit?usp=sharing 

Email me with any questions that arise. We’ll work on the TimeMapper again on Monday.